This article examines the global response to the Covid-19 pandemic in the era of the risk society. It employs literature-based analysis and study of legal sources. The first part of the article presents the crucial role of communicating information during a pandemic and the role of WHO in the area of infectious diseases. Confidence, public trust, and public involvement are according to Urlich Beck critical for the acceptance of risk related policies. This article, through the paradigm of a pandemic of the past, (the case of the bubonic plague in Ionian islands), argues how crucial is the communication of the uncertainties, the involvement of the public and the information networks. Furthermore, it supports that during the covid-19 crisis, health risk communication and management of the crisis were not sufficient. Some of the reasons were: the unclearance of the message transmitted, limited public and community participation in the decision making process and in shaping the health policy, crisis of public confidence, inadequacy of implemented policies, e.t.c. It concludes that collective and just solution, harmonized global action, access to information, international solidarity, and the involvement of the locals are of paramount importance.
| Published in | International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16 |
| Page(s) | 94-100 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pandemic, Collective Responsibility, Public Participation, WHO, Risk-society, Information, Corona Virus, Global Politics
| [1] | Nicoll, A & V. Murray, (2002) Health protection: a strategy and a national strategy. Public Health 2002; 116 (£): 129-37. |
| [2] | WHO (2020) Coronovirus Disease. Pandemic. Retrieved 20 December 2020 from: https://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/introduction/en/index5.html. |
| [3] | Beck, U. (2012) Twenty Observations on aword in turmoil, polity, 2012, p. 75. |
| [4] | World Health Organization (20.1.2020). Novel Corona virus – Situation Report. Retrieved 20 December 2020 from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4. |
| [5] | World Health Organization (30.1.2020). Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel corona virus (2019-nCoV). Retrieved 20 December 2020 from: https://www.who.int/news-room/ detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-internationalhealth-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreakof-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov. |
| [6] | New York Times (2020). China Grapples with mystery pneumonia like illness. Retrieved 20 December 2020 from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/06/world/asia/china-SARS-pneumonialike.html. |
| [7] | Columbia Journalism Review (2020). The pandemic and the information network. Retrieved 20 December 2020 from: https://www.cjr.org/analysis/covid-19-coronavirus-uncertainty.php. |
| [8] | Zacher, Mark W & Tania J. Keefe.(2008) The Politics of Global Health Governance: United by Contagion (New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2008) p. 26. |
| [9] | Caduff, C. (2020) What went wrong: Corona and the life after the full stop, MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY QUARTERLY, Vol. 0, Issue 0, pp. 1–21, ISSN 0745-5194, online ISSN 1548-1387. © 2020 The Authors. Medical Anthropology Quarterly published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Anthropological Association. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1111/maq.12599, P. 7. |
| [10] | Covello, V. T et al (2001), Risk Communication the West Nile Virus Epidemic and Bioterrorism: Responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting, J Urban Health, 2001; 78 (2) p. 382-91. |
| [11] | Slovic, P. (1999) Trust, Emotion, sex, politics and Science surveying the risk assessment battlefield. Risk Annal. 1999; 19 (4): p. 689-701. |
| [12] | Peters, R., Covello, V., McCallum D. (1997) The Determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Anal. 1997; (17) 1 p. 43-54. |
| [13] | Renn, O. & D. Levinne (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson, R, Stallen p, editors. Communicating risk to the public. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer; 1991. p. 175-218. |
| [14] | Santos, S., Covello, V., McCallum, D. (1996) Industry Response to SARA title III: Pollution prevention, risk reduction and risk communication. Risk Anal 1996; 16 (1): p. 57-65. |
| [15] | Abraham, T.(2009), Risk and outbreak communications: Lessons from alternate paradigms, B, World Health Organization, 2009; 87 (8) (2): 1-2. |
| [16] | Abraham, T. (2011) Lessons from the Pandemics: the need for new tools for risk and outbreak communication Emerging Health Threats Journal, 4: 1, 7160, DOI: 10.3402/EHTJ.V4i0.7160. |
| [17] | Covello, V. T. (2010), H1N1 risk and crisis communication: successes and challenges. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease control and Prevention; 2010. |
| [18] | Covello, V. T. & P. M. Sandman (2001) Risk communication: evolution and revolution In: Wolbarst A, editor. Solutions to an environment in peril. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2001, p. 164-78. |
| [19] | International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 19., http://www.ohchr.org/en/proffessionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx. |
| [20] | OHCR, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights general comment no 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health, 11 August 2000, http://www.refworld.org/pffid45388388D0.PDF. |
| [21] | Art. 5 (1). UNECE (2014), The Aarhus Convention. An implementation guide, 2th edition, June 2014, Retrieved 10 May 2020 from: http://www.unece.org/env/pp/implementatin_guide.html. |
| [22] | Nielsen, A., P., Lassen, J., & P. Sandøe (2004). Involving the Public—Participatory Methods and Democratic Ideals. Global Bioethics, 17 (1), p. 191-201. |
| [23] | UN (2020) We are all in this together. Human Rights and COVID-19 Response and Recovery, 23 April 2020, Retrieved 20 December 2020 from: https://www.un.org/en/un-coronovirus-communications-team/we-are-all-together-human-rights-and-COVID-19-response-and. |
| [24] | Council of Europe. Respecting Democracy, rule of Law and Human Rights in the framework of the COVID-19 sanitary crisis. A toolkit for member States, Information Documents SG/Inf (2020) 11, 7 April 2020. |
| [25] | WHO (2020) Risk communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Action Plan Guidance COVID-19: Prepardness and response, 16 March 2020, Retrieved 20 December 2020 from: http://www.who.int/publicationsdetail/risk-communication-and-community-engagement(rcce)-action –plan-guidance. |
| [26] | Wynne, B. (1992). Public understanding of science research: new horizons or hall of mirrors? Public Understanding of Science, 1, p. 37-44. |
| [27] | Sullivan, R. & C. Kalipso. (2020), Urgent Call for an Exit Plan: The Economic and Social Consequences of Response to COVID-19 Pandemic. Centre for Global Development website, March 31. Retrieved 12 April 2020 from: https://www.cgdev.org/blog/urgent-call-exit-planeconomic-and-social-consequences-responses-covid-19-pandemic. |
| [28] | WHO, (2005) WHO outbreak communications guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005 the other is and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication guidelines and training module WHO Constitution, pp. 2-3. |
| [29] | WHO (2016) Risk Communication. Pandemic influenza risk communication: Delivering Results in 2016 Retrieved 20 December 2020 from: https://www.who.int/risk-communication/pandemic-influenza-preparedness/delivering-results-2016/en/. |
| [30] | Busby, J, What international Relations tells us about Covid 19?,https://www.e-ir.info/2020/04/26/what-international-relations-tells-us-about-covid-19/. |
| [31] | Aaltola, M.(2020) Covid19-A trigger for global transformation? Political distancing, Global decoupling, and growing distrust in Health Governance, Finnish Institute of International Affairs, March 2020, 113, working paper, ISBN 978-951-769-632-6 ISSN 2242-0444. |
| [32] | Sturgis, P., & N. Allum, (2004). Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public understanding of science, 13 (1), 55-74. |
| [33] | Aginam, O. (2002). International law and communicable diseases. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, 946-951. |
| [34] | Scott S, Duncan C (2004) Return of the Black Death. The world’s greatest serial killer. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004 [Google Scholar]. |
| [35] | Konstantinidou, K. et al,(2009) Venetian Rule and control of Plague Epidemics on the Ionian islands during 17th and 18th centuries, Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Jan; 15 (1): 39–43., doi: 10.3201/eid1501.071545. |
| [36] | Kelly, J. (2005) The great mortality, an intimate history of the black death, the most devastating plague of all time. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.; 2005 [Google Scholar]. |
| [37] | Konstantinidou, K. (2007) The disaster creeps crawling… The plague epidemics of the Ionian Islands [in Greek]. Venice (Italy): Hellenic Institute of Byzantine and Post Byzantine Studies; 2007. p. 129, p. 55–203. [Google Scholar]. |
| [38] | Deaux, G. (1969) The black death 1347. New York: Weybright and Talley; 1969 [Google Scholar]. |
| [39] | Kostis, K. (1995) During the times of plague. Perspectives for the communities of the Greek peninsula, 14th–19th century [in Greek]. Heraklion (Greece): University of Crete Publications; 1995 [Google Scholar]. |
| [40] | Howard, J. (1789), An Account of the Principal Lazarettos in Europe with Various Papers Relative to the Plague: Together with Further Observations on Some Foreign Prisons and Hospitals; and Additional Remarks on the Present State of Those in Great Britain and Ireland, (Warrington: printed by William Eyres, and sold by T. Cadell, 1789), p. 34. |
| [41] | Cotterrell, R. (1997) ‘The concept of Legal Culture, in Nelken, D. Comparing Legal Cultures (Dartmouth). |
| [42] | Sharma, M.(2020) COVID-19 (An International Trauma): A Brief Analysis on Research Trends, Impacts and Solutions, International Journal for research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, ISSN: 2349-8889 Volume-7, Issue-2 (March 2020) https://doi.org/10.31033/ijrasb.7.2.1. |
| [43] | Latour, B. (2018), Climate Earth, Politics in a new climate regime, p. 15. |
| [44] | Foster, K & P. Huber (1999) Judging Science, Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts, MIT Press, Cambridge, p. 235-240. |
APA Style
Chrysoula Kapartziani. (2021). Communicating COVID-19 Uncertainty: Lessons from the Past. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 9(2), 94-100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16
ACS Style
Chrysoula Kapartziani. Communicating COVID-19 Uncertainty: Lessons from the Past. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2021, 9(2), 94-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16
AMA Style
Chrysoula Kapartziani. Communicating COVID-19 Uncertainty: Lessons from the Past. Int J Lit Arts. 2021;9(2):94-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16,
author = {Chrysoula Kapartziani},
title = {Communicating COVID-19 Uncertainty: Lessons from the Past},
journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
volume = {9},
number = {2},
pages = {94-100},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20210902.16},
abstract = {This article examines the global response to the Covid-19 pandemic in the era of the risk society. It employs literature-based analysis and study of legal sources. The first part of the article presents the crucial role of communicating information during a pandemic and the role of WHO in the area of infectious diseases. Confidence, public trust, and public involvement are according to Urlich Beck critical for the acceptance of risk related policies. This article, through the paradigm of a pandemic of the past, (the case of the bubonic plague in Ionian islands), argues how crucial is the communication of the uncertainties, the involvement of the public and the information networks. Furthermore, it supports that during the covid-19 crisis, health risk communication and management of the crisis were not sufficient. Some of the reasons were: the unclearance of the message transmitted, limited public and community participation in the decision making process and in shaping the health policy, crisis of public confidence, inadequacy of implemented policies, e.t.c. It concludes that collective and just solution, harmonized global action, access to information, international solidarity, and the involvement of the locals are of paramount importance.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Communicating COVID-19 Uncertainty: Lessons from the Past AU - Chrysoula Kapartziani Y1 - 2021/04/26 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16 T2 - International Journal of Literature and Arts JF - International Journal of Literature and Arts JO - International Journal of Literature and Arts SP - 94 EP - 100 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-057X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.16 AB - This article examines the global response to the Covid-19 pandemic in the era of the risk society. It employs literature-based analysis and study of legal sources. The first part of the article presents the crucial role of communicating information during a pandemic and the role of WHO in the area of infectious diseases. Confidence, public trust, and public involvement are according to Urlich Beck critical for the acceptance of risk related policies. This article, through the paradigm of a pandemic of the past, (the case of the bubonic plague in Ionian islands), argues how crucial is the communication of the uncertainties, the involvement of the public and the information networks. Furthermore, it supports that during the covid-19 crisis, health risk communication and management of the crisis were not sufficient. Some of the reasons were: the unclearance of the message transmitted, limited public and community participation in the decision making process and in shaping the health policy, crisis of public confidence, inadequacy of implemented policies, e.t.c. It concludes that collective and just solution, harmonized global action, access to information, international solidarity, and the involvement of the locals are of paramount importance. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -
Email: